Preview Connecticut Registered Sex Offenders
Finally, some states use a hybrid of offense-based and risk-assessment-based systems for classification. For example, Colorado law requires minimum terms of registration based on the conviction offense for which the registrant was convicted or adjudicated but also uses a risk assessment for identifying sexually violent predators — a limited population deemed to be dangerous and subject to more extensive requirements. Third, states distinguishing among registrants use differing systems and processes in establishing tier designations. In general, offense-based classification systems are used for their simplicity and uniformity.
Sex offender registries in the United States
They allow classification decisions to be made via administrative or judicial processes. Risk-assessment-based systems, which employ actuarial risk assessment instruments and in some cases clinical assessments, require more of personnel involvement in the process. Some states, like Massachusetts and Colorado, utilize multidisciplinary review boards or judicial discretion to establish registrant tiers or sexual predator status. In some states, such as Kentucky, Florida, and Illinois, all sex offenders who move into the state and are required to register in their previous home states are required to register for life, regardless of their registration period in previous residence.
States apply differing sets of criteria to determine which registration information is available to the public. In a few states, a judge determines the risk level of the offender, or scientific risk assessment tools are used; information on low-risk offenders may be available to law enforcement only.
In other states, all sex offenders are treated equally, and all registration information is available to the public on a state Internet site. Information of juvenile offenders are withheld for law enforcement but may be made public after their 18th birthday. Under federal SORNA , only tier I registrants may be excluded from public disclosure, with exemption of those convicted of "specified offense against a minor.
Disparities in state legislation have caused some registrants moving across state lines becoming subject to public disclosure and longer registration periods under the destination state's laws. Laws restricting where registered sex offenders may live or work have become increasingly common since In addition, hundreds of counties and municipalities have passed local ordinances exceeding the state requirements,   and some local communities have created exclusion zones around churches , pet stores , movie theaters , libraries , playgrounds , tourist attractions or other "recreational facilities" such as stadiums , airports , auditoriums , swimming pools , skating rinks and gymnasiums, regardless of whether publicly or privately owned.
The report also found that laws preclude registrants from homeless shelters within restriction areas. Restrictions may effectively cover entire cities, leaving small "pockets" of allowed places of residency. Evidence to support the effectiveness of public sex offender registries is limited and mixed. In fact, a number of negative unintended consequences have been empirically identified that may aggravate rather than mitigate offender risk. According to a study, the majority of the general public perceives sex offender recidivism to be very high and views offenders as a homogeneous group regarding that risk.
Consequently, the study found that a majority of the public endorses broad community notification and related policies. Critics of the laws point to the lack of evidence to support the effectiveness of sex offender registration policies. They call the laws too harsh and unfair for adversely affecting the lives of registrants decades after completing their initial sentence , and for affecting their families as well.
Critics say that registries are overly broad as they reach to non-violent offenses, such as sexting or consensual teen sex, and fail to distinguish those who are not a danger to society from predatory offenders. Lanning argues that registration should be offender-based instead of offense-based: "A sex-offender registry that does not distinguish between the total pattern of behavior of a year-old man who violently raped a 6-year-old girl and an year-old man who had 'compliant' sexual intercourse with his girlfriend a few weeks prior to her 16th birthday is misguided.
The offense an offender is technically found or pleads guilty to may not truly reflect his dangerousness and risk level". Some lawmakers recognize problems in the laws. However, they are reluctant to aim for reforms because of political opposition and being viewed as lessening the child safety laws.
- finding federal tax id number?
- Who Must Register?.
- Registered Sex Offenders?
- yellow pages for lake county florida.
These perceived problems in legislation have prompted a growing grass-roots movement to reform sex offender laws in the United States. Sex offender registration and community notification laws have been challenged on a number of constitutional and other bases, generating substantial amount of case law. Those challenging the statutes have claimed violations of ex post facto , due process , cruel and unusual punishment , equal protection and search and seizure.
In , in Connecticut Dept. Doe the U. Supreme Court affirmed public disclosure of sex offender information and in , in Smith v. Doe , the Supreme Court upheld Alaska's registration statute, reasoning that sex offender registration is civil measure reasonably designed to protect public safety, not a punishment , which can be applied ex post facto. However, law scholars argue that even if the registration schemes were initially constitutional they have, in their current form, become unconstitutionally burdensome and unmoored from their constitutional grounds.
A study published in fall found that statistics cited by Justice Kennedy in two U. Supreme Court cases commonly cited in decisions upholding constitutionality of sex offender policies were unfounded. In September federal judge found that Colorado registry is unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment as applied to three plaintiffs. Sex offender registration and community notification SORN laws carry costs in the form of collateral consequences for both sex offenders and their families, including difficulties in relationships and maintaining employment, public recognition, harassment, attacks, difficulties finding and maintaining suitable housing, as well as an inability to take part in expected parental duties, such as going to school functions.
Registration and notification laws affect not only sex offenders, but also their loved ones. Laws may force families to live apart from each other, because of family safety issues caused by neighbors, or because of residency restrictions. Family members often experience isolation, hopelessness and depression.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article is part of a series on the Sex offender registries in the United States Legislation. Doe Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Effectiveness of sex offender registration policies in the United States. Social issues. Reform activism. Movement to reform sex offender laws in the United States. This section may stray from the topic of the article. Please help improve this section or discuss this issue on the talk page. June Main article: Jacob Wetterling Act.
Main article: Megan's Law. See also: International Megan's Law. Main article: Effectiveness of sex offender registration policies in the United States. Main article: Constitutionality of sex offender registries in the United States. Law portal. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Retrieved Criminal Justice and Behavior. Nearby Places. Here is an updated list of sex offenders in Fairfield. Back to the Fairfield Patch. Read more local news from Fairfield.
Find out what's happening in Fairfield with free, real-time updates from Patch. You're now signed up for local updates. The Connecticut sex offender Registry provides information on Sex Offenders in the state. The information is available to the general public on the internet. The Registry is an online tool designed to help create awareness on the dangers of sex offenders. Connecticut Sex Offender law ensures that the information on the registry is up-to-date and accurate.
Sexual assault 1st degree of a person under 13 years of age when the offender is at least two years older than the victim - CONN.
Sexual assault 2nd degree when the victim is: 1 between the ages of 13 and 16, and the offender is at least 2 years older than the victim; 2 less than 18 years old and the actor is the victim's guardian or is otherwise responsible for the general supervision of the victim's welfare; or 3 the actor is a school employee and the victim is a student enrolled in a school in which the actor works or a school under the jurisdiction of the local or regional board that employs the actor - CONN.
Sexual assault 3rd degree when the actor engages in sexual intercourse with another person whom the actor knows to be related to him or her within specified degrees of kindred - CONN. Promoting prostitution 1st degree when the offender advances or profits from the prostitution of a person less than 16 years old - CONN. Promoting prostitution 2nd degree when the offender advances or profits from the prostitution of a person less than 18 years old - CONN.
Kidnapping 1st degree of a victim under the age of 18 - CONN. Kidnapping 1st degree with a firearm of a victim under the age of 18 - CONN. Kidnapping 2nd degree of a victim under the age of 18 - CONN. Kidnapping 2nd degree with a firearm of a victim under the age of 18 - CONN.
Unlawful restraint 1st degree of a victim under the age of 18 - CONN. Unlawful restraint 2nd degree of a victim under the age of 18 - CONN. Public indecency involving a victim under the age of 18 - CONN.nibabangracal.gq
State Police Sex Offender Registry - Disclaimer
Committing an offense listed above for which a person can be criminally liable for the acts of another or the attempt or conspiracy to commit one of the crimes listed above. Sexual assault 1st degree , except when the victim is under the age of 13, and the offender is at least two years older than the victim - CONN.
Sexual assault in a spousal or cohabiting relationship - CONN. Sexual assault 2nd degree - CONN. Kidnapping 1st degree , provided the court makes a finding that the offense was committed with the intent to sexually violate or abuse the victim - CONN.